EVE Search - [EBANK] Scandal Update

All Channels

Market Discussions

[EBANK] Scandal Update

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.10 23:20:00 - [1] Edited by: Gabriel Virtus on 10/10/2009 23:21:07 You villify Anastasia for taking her money after you tried to steal it from her? Are you serious? She voluntarily gave back the bulk of EBANK assets that she had and subtracted the money that you were trying to steal from her and you are villifying her? How DARE she do this! What a joke. This gets funnier and funnier as the fail cascade continues. You are throwing up smoke and mirrors to justify your theft of nearly 1.2T isk. Most players do not play as long as the time you have proposed to make up the 1.2T isk deficit that you find yourselves in through incompetence and/or theft. End this ****ed drama and give ppl their devalued assets back before your incompetence makes THEM and not YOUR money dwindles. I cannot believe any of you still have any sort of reputation after this. (Ray is probably excluded although I dont know how much longer he can keep this ** from eventually getting on his face too.) -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.11 00:31:00 - [2] Originally by: cosmoray Lucky AC grabbed the Titan prints or EBANK would most liekly failed on the spot. It seems that most of the directors were just trying to milk the system. With Anastasia I bet there are many people would have done the same, and taken what they think is theirs no matter what the consequences. I am torn about Anastasia having a place on Thieves of Eve's list if the NET result is zero. EBANK owed Anastasia approximately 10B and so took equivalent assets. Not sure if this counts as a scam. Also if Anastasia's previous crime was just "being useless", it doesn't look like he was involved in any of the previous conspiracy so probably feels along with most investors and just wants his cash back. My position was different I took money back from Evn7289 who was in league with Xabier. Both scammed together, I lost money from Xabier but got it back from Evn7289. I am not worried about my position on the list. Are you really considering putting her on the list for that conduct? I am not advocating what she did, but to villify her is complete nonsense. Frankly, put her on the list and make it as completely subjective and useless as the Nobel Peace Prize is. -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.11 01:29:00 - [3] Edited by: Gabriel Virtus on 11/10/2009 01:29:34 Originally by: Athre Quote: He(Anastasia) is just protecting his assets, can't blame him. It is in poor form to not hold ones self to the same constraints that one would hold others. I disagree with your stance on this. This means a lot coming from you Athre, or any of the BoD frankly. rofl -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.13 21:27:00 - [4] Edited by: Gabriel Virtus on 13/10/2009 21:29:04 7/10 Would read again! I think you guys should come up with a few more reasons as to how you managed to squander 1.4 trillion isk. I would say you should blame another 100B "discrepency" on a player that is going to take a break for a while. LVV and Athre, after letting 1.4B isk somehow get displaced, are criticizing and patronizing others? Lol? Really? Keep it coming! This stuff is great! -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.19 06:54:00 - [5] Originally by: Hexxx Through recorded history, people have sought to explain things they don't understand. They try to draw conclusions and link events together to come up with something that "makes sense". Coincidences can no longer be coincidences, but must be part of some grander design or purpose. In modern RL pop culture this takes the form of trashy magazines and gossip web sites. In EVE, you can see some rather obvious examples of it in this thread. Gee, and to think I thought this was where religion came from? Hmm. Thanks for that clarification. Clearly, none of these events have anything to do with each other. It is by pure coincidence that any event in life (or EVE) happens and they are never connected. I see what you did there Hexxx, this is called a logical fallacy. Maybe we should shoot for ad hominem next? -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.19 23:29:00 - [6] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Gabriel Virtus Clearly, none of these events have anything to do with each other. It is by pure coincidence that any event in life (or EVE) happens and they are never connected. I see what you did there Hexxx, this is called a logical fallacy. Maybe we should shoot for ad hominem next? I don't exactly agree that there's any logical fallacy at all. Hexxx is merely stating that people are making some rather bold(and often incorrect) assumptions in order to make sense of things. He also states that it's not exactly new, and that people do it all the time. He's not saying that nothing is ever connected. Take a step back and avoid assumptions, however logical they might seem. Nothing is ever as obvious as you think. Look harder. ItÆs an obvious one. Judging by most of the statement I have seen you write about economics, I guess I am not surprised you cannot find it. Everyone knows what Hexxx is trying to do. The problem is that there is a large blaring fallacy in his argument. His argument is farce and therefore bull** Originally by:** Hexxx Straw Man. Yeah, I can get cute too, the difference is that I'm better at it. Let me get this straight. Because you looked up the common name for a fallacy that you made in arguing, you are better at this than I am? It is obvious, I am clearly no match rofl. Yes, there is sarcasm It is a fallacy of ambiguity, this particular is commonly called the straw man fallacy. I can be cute too, I am just better at it than you are. In general, this thread is full of such errors. This one was just glaring and ridiculous. -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.20 21:46:00 - [7] Originally by: Amarr Citizen 155 Originally by: Gabriel Virtus This one was just glaring and ridiculous. You're glaring and ridiculous.....and you grammar are the suck. I know it doesn't seem as intelligent an argument since I'm not using the word "fallacy", but when I'm spewing bull** I like to spread it around evenly. Geez, they just crawl out of the woodwork. Aww, It's alright if you cannot understand. Maybe they hand out lollipops with the 75B in salaries? Originally by:** Amarr Citizen 155 Originally by: Gabriel Virtus This one was just glaring and ridiculous. You're glaring and ridiculous.....and you grammar are the suck. I know it doesn't seem as intelligent an argument since I'm not using the word "fallacy", but when I'm spewing bull I like to spread it around evenly. There you go buddy, I cited the relevent parts of your post for you. -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.21 01:52:00 - [8] Edited by: Gabriel Virtus on 21/10/2009 01:52:16 So is EBank accepting deposits? -GV
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.21 01:57:00 - [9] Edited by: Gabriel Virtus on 21/10/2009 01:57:31 Originally by: Hexxx Originally by: Kalrand Originally by: RaWBLooD crap slightly less crap Or just buying into the groupthink of people who believe there is no such thing as experts...because any failure at any time means an automatic revocation of your "member of the expert club" card. Joy! The world is full of amateurs! Yes Hexxx, because everything is either black or white. There are only extremes in life. You are full of gems! -GV edit: oh wait, I forgot the
Gabriel Virtus hirr	Posted - 2009.10.23 06:00:00 - [10] Originally by: Hexxx Useful comments that everyone cares about Originally by: Hexxx Useful comments that everyone cares about No sir, What is this sarcasm you speak of -GV

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.